I and my body

People

Source (link to git-repo or to original if based on someone elses unmodified work): Add the source-code for this project on opencode.net

3
5 .6
Description:

It is wallpapers inspired by my boyfriend.

Hi, I think I no more put my wallpapers here before You do'nt like it. If You realy like it, You can contact me by email.

PS2
If You like me and my work and whish to domate me (to new camera) send me email.
Last changelog:

13 years ago

- added the last wallpaper

arnodupuis

14 years ago

Come on guys !
I do agree about the fact that's a public forum, but those pictures do not show more than you can see on ads in the Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam metro (subway for you English people) !!

Well, this is my opinion but their should be at least a KDE logo on the pictures as justification ;-)

PS: for the kid an his governement's call, I am curious on how he will present the thing : "Mr President I saw a woman's tits that unacceptable !!"... hem except for the infamous G.W "the butcher" Bush i don't think it will work a lot ^^

Report

Dapper

14 years ago

I'm British I coulden't give a penny for your crappy President, God Save the Queen!

Report

Dapper

14 years ago

and Also 14 is not a kid (at least in England) I am a Teenager, you daft sod!

Report

Dapper

14 years ago

ok, when I saw the first one I thought it looked inappropriate but if any of you care to go back a few days on KDE-LOOK you will see that it has gone from a bit off to this, I wonder if you didn't post these pictures just to see if the nerd can be turned on or something, anyway although half of me is liking this half of me is totally disagreeing with it, I am 14 years of age and I do not wish to see this kind of content on a public Web site, this post is not influenced by anyone other than myself and I do believe I can contact the government and remove your content, so save me the trouble!

Report

pkoolon

14 years ago

www.porn-kde.org

Report

kankei71

14 years ago

There is a certain misunderstanding with some of you. Nudity, erotism, pornography are different things. I definitly don't like those pictures but I'm amazed of some of the reactions posted here.

Report

gen2

14 years ago

Is it really you or just some pervert, because how can we verify?

Though the idea of open source pr0n sounds appealing, I think you should post your art somewhere else.

Report

d3f3nd3r

14 years ago

Let me break it down for you sweetheart.

Your basically gonna find two types of alpha personalities here (and the uninitiated will be somewhere in the middle).

Those that will condem you for anything that is overtly sexual in nature no matter how "artistic" it may seem.

And those that just want to gawk at a naked body (no matter whose it isor what position its in).

Theres no argument that your smokin hot ;) but if you truly want to make something more of your "talents" KDE look probably is not the place to launch your modeling career.

Why? because it is a very open public forum where you are not catering to just one mindset but to all the others as well.

You'd be better off finding a site that supports your goals.

Thats just my opinion though,

I wish you luck.

Report

komisarz

14 years ago

It's going on for too long. As somebody has already said - it's not that kind of site to post such things. The first pictures were acceptable - not showing everything - but now they are to explicit, well, let's not be afraid of using this word - they are pornografic.
PS. Oj, chyba nie kryptoreklama, zastanawiałbym się raczej nad jakimś zaburzeniem

Report

Jurek

14 years ago

Piekna dziewczyna, ale czy to nie aby kryptoreklama ?? :) Pozdrawiam

Report

keba

14 years ago

Please keep decent or add your "wallpapers" to another site. Or at least keep decent whith the screenshots (by putting a black square on some parts of the body, for example)... This isn't a porn site.

Report

RipTorn

14 years ago

It is intresting how such a simple topic can generate so many comments in such a short time ;)

Report

poschl74

14 years ago

hi there - i like your wallpapers -
but they have nothing in common with
KDE or LINUX. Perhaps deviantart.com
would be the right choice for this kind
of wallpapers.

Report

ariszlo

14 years ago

I don't know. This site is full of nature photos and no one is complaining about them.

Report

MMax

14 years ago

nice body hehe... but background needs defenetaly som more work.

Keep going! ;)

Report

hanzar

14 years ago

are you real..? there was a woman like you in the world..? :))).. }SeXy}

Report

creativeambience

14 years ago

I respect your expression as an artist, but it is perpetually important to be cognizant of your audience. There *are* children on kde-look.org who don't know the difference between nudity as an art form and as something that is sexual in nature and therefore lack the 'appreciation' for nudity as an art form - it just becomes pr0n for them. So...while I respect your expresion, I would strongly suggest trying another venue, such as deviantART, or perhaps advocating the implementation of restrictions on kde-look content until a user has registered an account. This won't keep eyes out that seek this material, but it will prevent those who might otherwise not be prepared for exposure from seeing material such as this before they have matured appropriately.

Report

gnemmi

14 years ago

Wouldn't it be easier if those children's parents looked after him and took the apropiate measures to prevent their children for getting a glimps of such an obscenity as human nudity?

After all .. aren't those parents responsable for the caring and education of their children?

The answer to why free expression should be cercenated in order to let uncareful parents not to fulfill their legal duties and responsabilities is something that really eludes me.

Should libraries not carry certain books only beacuse uncarefuly raised children may take a peek on them?

Should Video stores not carry certain products only beacuse uncarefuly raised children may take a peek on them?

Should the internet turn itself into a children's playground and all the knowledge shared whithin it be only as complex as a child can understand, because otherwise children might not comprehend what it means and thus missinterpret it?

Wouldn't it be much easier if those who brought life to this world, took care of it as they are supposed to?

Wouldn't it be a lot less harmfull to everybody's rights if those parents took the time and the effort to do as they are supposed to do?

Report

euxneks

14 years ago

Wouldn't it be easier if those children's parents looked after him and took the apropiate measures to prevent their children for getting a glimps of such an obscenity as human nudity?

To a certain degree. I think it's not right for parents to expect other people to look after their children for them, but in that same vein of thought, we have to consider what the implications are of exposing a child to such material. I doubt it's as scarring or traumatic for a child to be exposed to a naked woman as it is to be taught that the naked body is something that should be hidden and embarrassed about.

Should the internet turn itself into a children's playground and all the knowledge shared whithin it be only as complex as a child can understand, because otherwise children might not comprehend what it means and thus missinterpret it?


Hrm. I was going to say this is irrelevant but knowledge of sex is still knowledge. I think we have to accept sooner or later that once a child has access to something as large as the internet, they are going to learn things. However, having said that, I don't think I would want any child of mine to be looking at pictures of nude women, much less placing them on their desktop.

So, what's the solution? I don't think kde-look.org should have an XXX section of the site, because that could easily become very scary and take over the site - it is after all the basest nature of man to procreate.

On the other hand, I usually come here to gather pictures of plants, serene images etc. etc. that have mostly to do with linux. I don't look for pictures like this on kde-look.org because I don't think of kde-look.org as a repository for these images and I am glad of that.

Yes, she has a nice body, smooth skin etc. etc. All very admirable, but this is not the place to post such pictures.

Report

gnemmi

14 years ago

I doubt it's as scarring or traumatic for a child to be exposed to a naked woman as it is to be taught that the naked body is something that should be hidden and embarrassed about.

Well ... that makes two of us.

I was going to say this is irrelevant but knowledge of sex is still knowledge.

Pretty clever of you not taking that bait ;)
Sorting out whether a given kind of knowledge is or is not relevant carries huge risks ... and has failed miserably in the past. It has actually costed lives ...

I don't think I would want any child of mine to be looking at pictures of nude women, much less placing them on their desktop.

And so wouldn't I. That's why I don't let third parties the control on what my childrens are exposed to. That control is on me, and only on me.

So, what's the solution? I don't think kde-look.org should have an XXX section of the site

Agreed.

All very admirable, but this is not the place to post such pictures.

It's not really clear what you mean by "such" and how that concept of "such" fits into the concept of "art" ... or are you willing to state that "art" is only "art" if it fits into the boundaries of some undetermined limits (namely: a "such")?

Yet the answer to the question "why should free expression be cercenated in order to let uncareful parents not to fulfill their legal duties and responsabilities" is something that _still_ really eludes me.

Report

euxneks

14 years ago

And so wouldn't I. That's why I don't let third parties the control on what my childrens are exposed to. That control is on me, and only on me.

True, however, there is a certain amount of decency that generally all human societies have, though varying in extremes, we can expect some people not to show their bodily parts to a child - this is generally considered unacceptable specifically because society as a whole has defined the moral limits of decency. But then again there are nudist camps. I have no idea what they consider "decent". :P

It's not really clear what you mean by "such" and how that concept of "such" fits into the concept of "art" ... or are you willing to state that "art" is only "art" if it fits into the boundaries of some undetermined limits (namely: a "such")?

Naked bodies and/or body parts. They're not really something that I would want on my desktop - again, this varies from person to person so I guess I should state that this is my opinion. =) So, my opinion: "I would prefer there not to be a pornographic section/ adult section to kde-look.org" I think of kde-look.org as a place where people can gather to share what is considered traditionally as Appolonian art. The stuff that looks nice and has symmetry, utilitarian maybe, etc. etc.

Yet the answer to the question "why should free expression be cercenated in order to let uncareful parents not to fulfill their legal duties and responsabilities" is something that _still_ really eludes me.

I think he/she meant "censored" ;P I agree with not censoring, but we can still decide where we go and who we allow ourselves to associate with when we approach there. As far as I know, this is a community based website and as such there isn't complete freedom. We all expect each other not to post extremes on the site and I think nude pictures are pushing it a bit too far. Topless women are still a little bit far, but I guess that's my North American (Canada actually) close-mindedness. (Is that a word?) I enjoy the female body (nekkid, as it were) as much as the next red-blooded male but I would have to say that this hasn't been in the past a site to post this kind of art. (as far as I'm aware).. I think we should keep it that way.

Note: Since I had last posted one of the previews has cut the top and bottom parts of the wallpapers off to censor certain body parts of the female persuasion =)

Report

linuxpimp

14 years ago

why are the people here hating mine art and giving you nice words and a happy point.?we are both not ugly.

Report

RipTorn

14 years ago

I think there is a slight difference in sticking up pictures of someone cracking their asscheeks open...

http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=45233

:\ come on ... also for someone to pretend not to know how to speak "Engrish" its the difference in saying that is terrible and voting bad on it, and sticking up your own pics in anger, this is KDE-Look not myspace.

Report

linuxpimp

14 years ago

thanks for making post of my art... my anus opening is no for looking into.... the art is tasty done..not trash. no holes no public hair crotch. you are an ass cracking open with bad feelings and anger. be nice I show no fur.

Report

Divilinux

14 years ago

i'm courious to see next wallpaper
you started with soft,naked,completely naked..i'm scared to what figure it out next..?

Report

13 years ago

- added the last wallpaper

12345678910
2016
product-maker xeng Nov 08 2016 3 bad
product-maker quazgar Nov 04 2013 3 bad
product-maker pamfeuer Sep 08 2013 3 bad
product-maker hammel Mar 25 2013 3 bad
product-maker space-diver Dec 29 2012 9 excellent
product-maker einar77 Nov 01 2012 3 bad
product-maker mdye Oct 20 2012 3 bad
product-maker heitormsilva May 06 2012 3 bad
product-maker maxblank Oct 17 2011 3 bad
product-maker deepfire Oct 01 2011 9 excellent
product-maker soyanede Aug 30 2011 9 excellent
product-maker smn86 Aug 16 2011 9 excellent
product-maker watho Aug 03 2011 9 excellent
product-maker Fynivx Aug 01 2011 9 excellent
product-maker lbl Jun 10 2011 9 excellent
product-maker supermadman Jun 02 2011 9 excellent
product-maker Kirilo May 23 2011 9 excellent
product-maker Stringiamano May 07 2011 3 bad
product-maker kujules Apr 03 2011 9 excellent
product-maker jokefin93 Apr 02 2011 9 excellent
product-maker RealSpinner Mar 22 2011 3 bad
product-maker donpedro69 Mar 20 2011 3 bad
product-maker philopdx Mar 06 2011 9 excellent
product-maker cippaciong Mar 03 2011 3 bad
product-maker bruno82 Feb 24 2011 9 excellent
product-maker aminesay Feb 04 2011 3 bad
product-maker cityhunt Jan 28 2011 3 bad
product-maker jmc88 Jan 27 2011 9 excellent
product-maker uommo Jan 27 2011 3 bad
product-maker J0nas Dec 28 2010 9 excellent
product-maker valep Nov 21 2010 9 excellent
product-maker freddastern Nov 18 2010 3 bad
product-maker mmj Nov 18 2010 3 bad
product-maker KrayZee Oct 30 2010 3 bad
product-maker dobrynya Oct 14 2010 3 bad
product-maker ggpanta Sep 25 2010 3 bad
product-maker Base: 4 x 5.0 Ratings
Be the first to comment
corudlai
May 01 2016
milniko
Oct 27 2009
redsteakraw
Jul 28 2009
File (click to download) Version Description Downloads Date Filesize DL OCS-Install MD5SUM
*Needs pling-store or ocs-url to install things
Pling
0 Affiliates
Details
license
version
XP
updated Dec 27 2006
added Aug 29 2006
downloads 24h
0
mediaviews 24h 0
pageviews 24h 22