
Linux Class 2
Source (link to git-repo or to original if based on someone elses unmodified work): Add the source-code for this project on opencode.net
tutanchamun
14 years ago
Report
debian1993
14 years ago
Report
sphincter
14 years ago
Report
SouthernCross79
14 years ago
Report
SouthernCross79
14 years ago
Report
slick83
14 years ago
Report
cmost
14 years ago
Report
beany
14 years ago
This should'nt be a place of anger, (Windows bashing excluded).
sorry bout the spelling.
Report
chavo
14 years ago
Report
cpufx
14 years ago
Report
Divilinux
14 years ago
is not a mini-dressed woman..and is not artistic..
remind me some porn movies^^
Report
aergern
14 years ago
Report
ziuchkov
14 years ago
Report
surfg
14 years ago
Personally, I don't think the girl is even that hot.
However, I'm forced to disagree with your stance of "kde-related" stuff. People come to this website looking for stuff to make their desktops look better (to them, at least). If people find it beautiful, there's no reason why it shouldn't be here.
Maybe not the point you were trying to argue, and if it's off-topic, I apologize.
Report
clearthought
14 years ago
Report
beany
14 years ago
Report
petar
14 years ago
Report
cyrtainne
14 years ago
Report
caminoix
14 years ago
"why" is another question...
Report
tvsadako
14 years ago
Report
cmost
14 years ago
Report
caminoix
14 years ago
2. i don't think i could think nudity is offensive in itself. human body can be really beautiful (though not every single specimen actually is...) and what could be wrong in showing sth beautiful?
3. nevertheless, the overall artistic quality of this picture is not so to say stunning.
don't you guys think 3. is more important than 2.?
especially on a site like this.
Report
katana2k
14 years ago
why censor nudity? whats the point?!
Report
BorgQueen
14 years ago
Now, proprietary OS candy emulations, that's offensive!
Report
DrWeird
14 years ago
I just want to know... why are you all so big on what liscense it is? No one pays attention to it and cares! lol
It's still there, either way.
He could have put it under Proprietary License, and no one would have known the difference. Except of course for the one who made it. It doesn't hurt you. It would just hurt the one who put it up here, and you act like you're gonna get sued.
Report