
TuxCommielinux
Source (link to git-repo or to original if based on someone elses unmodified work): Add the source-code for this project on opencode.net
Jessard
15 years ago
Report
Jessard
15 years ago
Report
Jessard
15 years ago
Report
Tovarish
16 years ago
VIVA CHE! VAMOS HERMANO!
Let's obliterate the capitalist scum!! GO FARC-EP!
WOOOhooo so nice to see something like you here!! Wooot woot!
Y con Fidel te decimos
Hasta siempre Comandante...
Report
Tovarish
16 years ago
*someone*
... not something.
lol
Report
Microtubule
17 years ago
Report
nibble
17 years ago
Report
DrakingMan
17 years ago
So is M$, but ponder it amongst yourselves.
I don't think there are 'pure' nations following one ideology or the other; though I do believe Socialism and Democracy can work well together.
Report
marccd
17 years ago
I SAW FIDEL GIVING A SPEECH IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA... HE ENDED WITH "HASTA LA VICTORIA SIEMPRE"... AND THE CROWD.. JUST EXPLODED..
FUCK AMERICA.... VIVA FIDEL..
VIVA CHAVEZ... VIVA LULA, VIVA EL MOVIMIENTO BOLIVIARANO, VIVAN LAS FARC - EP, OR COLOMBIAN REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES, THE ONLY WAY TO GET LATIN AMERICA FREE, IS AN UNION, AGAINST THE EVIL EMPIRE.. AS PERON, AS FIDEL, AS BOLIVAR, AS SAN MARTIN, AS ME, AS EL CHE, AS EVERY LATIN WANTS.....
HASTA LA VICTORIA SIEMPRE....
WITH FIDEL WE WILL DEFEAT...
(DONT REPLY THIS AND START A FIGHT, OR ELSE I'LL HAVE TO EXECUTE YOU WITH A POPULAR AND COMMUNIST SHOOTING SQUAD)
Report
Chris308
17 years ago
Newsflash: apparantly our Army has not recieved this message. They just spent nearly 500 million dollars with Microsoft. The could have used opensource software and had enough money left over to buy 1/3 of a stealth bomber. I guess their loss is Iran's gain.
Report
OddFox
17 years ago
Look at Red Hat, SuSE, etc... People know that Linux can survive in a capitalist market, because there will always be people who chose convenience and quality (In the form of formal support) over cheapness and simplicity. Besides, the Linux community (And I'm not saying this as an outsider, even though it sounds like I am) will sooner or later realize that unless they begin to show actual support for their precious angel, it's not going to grow nearly as much as it has the potential to.
Disclaimer: When I say Linux, look at the context, because it could be referring to the kernel, or a distribution.
Report
johanneswilm
17 years ago
I as a communists am however more interested in trying to get across the communist-scare and explain to people that the OS-production-model really is what Marx predicted would be the future mode of production which would be the main mode of production under socialism, but that a radical break with capitalism is neccesary at some point of time which is done by the workers of the capitalist companies taking over control over their own labor. Else any alternative mode of production will be crushed eventually by capitalists who seek higher profits (in this case: SCO, MS, etc.). I therefor think it is important not to copy everything Marx said, but certainly to use some of those insights if one wants OS to persist.
Report
paradoxz
17 years ago
Report
dittohead
17 years ago
although quote unquote "american democracy" maybe less "superior", but the marxist theory, along with communism, socialism, facism etc. relies on an uncorrupt, sinless people and leaders, which cannot be found in humanity.
utopia does not exist, cannot exist without some divine influence that controls people's minds.
that is why democracy sort of works, it has safeguards against corrupt people (everyone is corrupt to a point however). a system of checks and balances keeps this country in line. something that communism doesn't have.
i use linux, i hate windows (and mac). and i'm a capitalist pig. so sue me.
Report
OddFox
17 years ago
As for the wallpaper, and the Communist look-and-feel in general, I sure do love the whole red thing going on, of course. :)
Report
jadrian
17 years ago
So lets look at the license, GPL. Does it make any sense? In my opinion NO, and it is current practice on this site.
So I'm voting it bad, sorry.
:-/
Report
johanneswilm
17 years ago
I think it would be better to remove all the "soviet-alike" symbolism (well the hammer&sickle) so that all flavors of communists can enjoy it (put something else in there if possible). Anyways: also with the hammer&sickle I think it is great!
Report
Fingel
17 years ago
Report
jadrian
17 years ago
I've been reading the GPL to see if I am wrong about this. My conclusion is that maybe I am as it may apply to non-software works.
One of my questions is, what is the source code... well depending on how you made the picture, the picture itself might or might not be the source. In your case I think it makes sense to say it is.
Still I didn't like your answer at all because you say:
"Just means I can take that wallpaper and do whatever I want to it".
Wrong! GPL is not just that. It states what one can and what one *cannot* do with GPL'ed work, and there are many things that cannot be done.
So once again, unless you really know what you're doing, sometimes the best option is to leave that field blank, and not just put GPL because "every linux stuff is GPL anyway"... (and in case you're wondering, that is exactly what I would do, leave it blank).
COMMUNISM:
No, one thing has nothing to do with the other.
Well even if I'm wrong about the GPL I'm still glad I voted bad.
Report
Fingel
17 years ago
This is taken from the GPL. I see two things in the bold text. Distributed weath (source code if I may) and freedom to do what I want whith it, as long as I give credit to original author. What does that sound like to you? Definatly not capitalism.
Now the source of the picture would proably be all the layers used to put the picture together, assuming he did save a GIMP or PSD file without flattening it first. I would like to see people outting these Gimp or Phototshop files up if they really are GPL.
Report
jadrian
17 years ago
No, you can not do what you want with it.
That is nowhere in the text. Again, there are lots of things you cannot do with GPLed stuff.
Again, communism has nothing to do with this. First we are talking about software and related stuff, not material welth, when I share it I still get to keep it all to myself.
But more important than that, I share what I want to share, I use the GPL when I want to, there are things I won't share and it is my right not to. Don't mix things.
"Now the source of the picture would proably be all the layers used to put the picture together, assuming he did save a GIMP or PSD file without flattening it first. I would like to see people outting these Gimp or Phototshop files up if they really are GPL."
Exactly, so I don't have any idea what he used to make it, since it is very simple I thought he might have used some paintbrush clone or something, I think that in that case the picture and the source could be the same.
Like you say, that might not be the case, it may have been done in GIMP or Photoshop, and in that case by not distributing the sources he is violating the GPL.
Report
Fingel
17 years ago
We are not talking about material wealth
In the world of free software and ideas that we indulge in everyday, what can be considered wealth? If anything it would be sourcecode. Good sourcecode makes better programs, which make life (our OS) faster, more productable and pleasurable. Not to mention, if you have good sourcecode you will get recognition. What does this sound like to you? MONEY. It's practicly the same thing, except with the GPL, its distributed equally among the people, Which brings me back to my original argument. : )
Report
Fingel
17 years ago
Report
jadrian
17 years ago
You got to be kidding. There are even restrictions regarding linkage of GPLed software with other software with incompatible licences. Come on, instead of posting do your homework.
And I don't even claim I'm an expert in licencing issues. I don't know that much compared to many people, still I know enough to see that you don't have any idea what you're talking about.
As for the rest of your comment, just read what I wrote again if you want an answer, all of it it, don't ignore/snip the important parts and you'll understand.
Report
epoch
17 years ago
Anyway, if you wanted to be correct, your wallpaper would have stated GNU/Linux not just Linux.
Report