
MacOS Classic Sound Pack
Source (link to git-repo or to original if based on someone elses unmodified work): Add the source-code for this project on opencode.net
linuxrook420
11 years ago
Report
cypherpunk
11 years ago
http://stevenjaycohen.googlecode.com/files/macossounds.zip
Report
sagefire
12 years ago
http://code.google.com/p/stevenjaycohen/
Report
Lockal
13 years ago
Report
Otakon
13 years ago
thanks to repair the Link.
Report
fasiko
13 years ago
Report
mssever
14 years ago
Report
Simzer
14 years ago
Report
celux
14 years ago
Report
agentdunken
15 years ago
Thanks for posting!
Report
anmaster
15 years ago
Report
borisdigital
15 years ago
those damn Mac Sounds ;)
Report
piedamaro
15 years ago
Report
thujone
15 years ago
Report
Crazykriz
15 years ago
http://sagefire.org/2005/04/04/macos-classic-sound-pack-v14/
Report
cmost
16 years ago
Report
andrep74
16 years ago
But, I don't think that you will do this. Your posts are ignorant, logically fallible, rude, and sarcastic: you seem to think "irregardless" is a word (made up in your fantasy world, I guess), that air can be "copyrighted" (not a shred of sense there), that everyone else wears "panties" (like you, I'm led to conclude), and, after trashing someone else's advice and logically-inferred conclusions, wish them to enjoy the holidays!
Note that if Apple wants to sue you, kde-look.org can give them a name, email address, and IP address. From your inability to demonstrate intelligence or responsibility, however, I would say you have no assets worth going after. Hopefully a moderator or responsible person will remove your files and do the community a favor before the whole site is shut down.
Report
cmost
16 years ago
Report
andrep74
16 years ago
Report
andrep74
16 years ago
I agree with Kwack in every respect. These sounds, especially in their entirety, are not meant for public consumption unless Apple releases them.
Report
Kwack
16 years ago
> sometimes it's better to give than to
> receive.
To give *what*? Someone else's work?
What you continually fail to realize is that it is not up to you (or anyone else) to make sure that other people (with various levels of success) do good deeds of giving (indeed, this would be only possible through coercion which in effect would make such acts not to be done from the heart and therefore oxymoronic and arguably pointless), nor that you know the best what should someone else do to make their business better (or to make themselves feel better).
Yes, it is truly nice and generous of someone to give *their own* work away. That is truly an act done in the spirit of the holiday that surrounds (most of) us. Now if you "generously give away" someone else's work, then that's a whole different story...
The bottom line is that while I agree with you that this world would be a lot better place if there was more generosity (or as you put it, "it is better to give than to receive"), but what is even more important is that this choice is left to the author. Otherwise the act itself loses its meaning.
> Thanks and have a blessed holiday.
No problem and same to you!
Report
cmost
16 years ago
Report
Kwack
16 years ago
Yet, you are obviously missing my point which leads me to believe that discussing this matter with you any further would be a futile task.
Report
cmost
16 years ago
Report
Kwack
16 years ago
Please understand that what follows is a reply to the "Perspective plea" comment rather than the critique of this post as it has not been yet confirmed whether this post has been made with Apple's consent or not (although portions of it are certainly applicable to the original post).
Do you think that those sounds were easy to create? Someone made them just like someone composed every song you hear on the radio and guess what? Every performance of a song via the radio results in some amount of royalties paid out to the composer and/or performer. Now, why should these sounds be any different? Someone has the ownership over them and here we are having them posted apparently without their creator's consent. I am sure that their creator also has a family to feed (or at least to feed themselves) and if they did not give you a permission to disseminate their work why would you want to do that? That is immorally wrong and if that does not bother you, then it's just plain illegal which ever way you look at it.
In addition, with this kind of attitude you are not only making yourself look bad, but also are tarnishing the entire Linux/KDE community by implying that we are bunch of geeks fostering piracy of content that is not our own.
Flattery or not, it is author's right to make decision whether something will be freely available or not, and every civilized person should respect that.
Finally, if you like so much the feel of the Mac desktop perhaps you should simply buy a Mac, instead of desperately trying to make your Linux box look like one.
Report