

state:on-line"
it doesn't make a difference wheter the battery is plugged in or not. but i forgot to tell: the battery status doesn't work out of the box under linux because of a messed up DSDT so i had to replace it with a working one. i don't know if that makes a difference though.
should the ouput look like this?
---------------------------------
cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/state
present: yes
capacity state: ok
charging state: charging
present rate: unknown
remaining capacity: 3801 mAh
present voltage: 2 mV
---------------------------------
ogott - Jul 22 2005

KDE Plasma Screenshots by bonafide 22 comments

Emoticons by wsjunior 53 comments
"THIS PRODUCT AND ALL THE FEATURES LISTED ABOVE ARE FREE"
(but it doesn't say "free" as in "freebeer" or as in "freedom") and a bit later:
"You may not rent, sell, lease, sublicense, distribute, assign, copy [...], or in any way transfer the Software or use the Software for the benefit of any third party [...]"
it seems to be ok to host and redistribute the icons here, but as is said, choosing GPL in the upload dialog might not be the best choice. - Jul 16 2005
that was a typo. the file isn't called "sate" but "state", so the code in acpi_aio.py is correct. and i tried everything i could imagine in the config-utility: /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ACAD, /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ACAD/state, /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/, /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/state
but as i said: that didn't change anything :( - Jul 16 2005
1. very good theme!
2. the battery status doesn't work for me. it works in kde in general and even in gkrellm. i couldn't find out where they get the status from, so i can't fix it myself. all i know is that /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/AC doesn't exist here, but there is /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ACAD containing only one file: "sate" (it's got only one line in it that says "state: on-line"). but there seems to be much more information in /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/.
it seems strange to me that /usr/bin/acpi doesn't tell me my battery state and a "/usr/bin/acpi -d /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/" simply outputs "No support for device type: battery". (support for the battery is compiled into the kernel, version 2.6.11)
i really don't know what to do about that and i'd really like to use this theme because it's one that seems to work reliably and stable until now. besides that, it's functional!
ogott - Jul 15 2005

Various KDE 1.-4. Improvements by nookie 60 comments
maybe i don't get it, but as i see it, there is no need for yet another package management program for kde. or are you simply complaining about kpackage? what is it that you don't like about it? - Jul 13 2005

Audio Apps by mussgill 21 comments
-------------------------------------------------
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ogott/src/kzenexplorer-0.3/src'
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/taglib -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT main.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/main.Tpo" -c -o main.o main.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/main.Tpo" ".deps/main.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/main.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
In file included from kzenexplorerview.h:37,
from kzenexplorer.h:47,
from main.cpp:42:
kzentrack.h:56: error: Fehler beim Parsen before `*' token
In file included from kzenexplorerview.h:39,
from kzenexplorer.h:47,
from main.cpp:42:
kzenplaylist.h:47: error: Fehler beim Parsen before `*' token
In file included from kzenexplorerview.h:40,
from kzenexplorer.h:47,
from main.cpp:42:
kzensmartplaylist.h:64: error: `njb_playlist_t' was not declared in this scope
kzensmartplaylist.h:64: error: `pl' was not declared in this scope
kzensmartplaylist.h:64: error: Fehler beim Parsen before `*' token
make[3]: *** [main.o] Fehler 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ogott/src/kzenexplorer-0.3/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ogott/src/kzenexplorer-0.3/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ogott/src/kzenexplorer-0.3'
make: *** [all] Fehler 2
-------------------------------------------------
any suggestions? - Apr 10 2005

Audio Apps by AntonioFasolato 15 comments

Audio Apps by AntonioFasolato 15 comments

Audio Apps by AntonioFasolato 15 comments
ogott - Dec 12 2004

Icon Sub-Sets by ursaix 9 comments

Icon Sub-Sets by ogott 3 comments
well, i use it for a program called "nvidia-settings" that you get with newer nvidia drivers (1.0-6106 and above). here's the readme to it with all it's functionality described: ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/1.0-6106/nvidia-settings-user-guide.txt
here's a screenshot:
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0306501/stuff/nvidia-settings.png
ogott - Sep 25 2004

GTK1 Themes by davidsansome 280 comments
ogott - Sep 25 2004
at least imho.
ogott - Sep 23 2004

KDE 3.x Splash Screens by ATAHUALPA 4 comments
sorry!!! i'm using this splashscreen now, nice work!
ogott - Sep 16 2004

Various KDE 1.-4. Improvements by trollo321 16 comments

Various KDE 1.-4. Improvements by trollo321 16 comments

Karamba & Superkaramba by schultz-dk 11 comments
thanks anyways,
ogott - Sep 05 2004

Karamba & Superkaramba by schultz-dk 11 comments
"nvidia-settings -q gpucoretemp" says that 'GPUCoreTemp' isn't available on my computer. - Sep 05 2004

Icon Sub-Sets by Phr0stByte 5 comments
to an png and changed the colors a bit...
anyways, it looks great!
ogott - Jun 02 2004

Wallpaper Other by nymark 8 comments

Wallpaper Other by timbrown527 8 comments
it is just like this: i prefer believing in science that gives me answers that seem to be plausible to me than believing in a creature of which nobody can give me any evidence for its existence. in addition, most religions (like the christian religion) want me to PAY MONEY. i have no idea why i should pay money. i can believe in whatever i want without paying any money.
further, the christian religion is quite intolerant. i'm not gay, but i respect other people's sexual orientation, the church doesn't (only one example). but my favourite example is this one: why did the church kill people in the medieval age who said that the world isn't flat but spheric? ok, it is against the "facts" that were written down by a greek philosopher a few thousand years ago. this seems to be ok, but why did they admit in the 20. century that they were wrong, that they killed people because they said something against the churches lies and accept now what has already been plausible hundreds of years ago?
this is in my opinion already enough to think about the reliability of the church and its "facts". if you still don't want to think for yourself, let me give another example: the bible says, that the earth has been created within seven days. if i remember correctely, the vegetation has been created on the second or third day. a day is defined by the rotation of the earth around its axis until the sun is "on top" again. the sun was created on the fourth day. how long were the first three days then? think about it.
oh, and please don't come with such arguments as "you don't have to take that literally". if i don't take it literally, i can interpret everything as i want.
besides these inconsistencies, would you believe in a book of which nobody knows who the author is, which is hundreds of years old and which has been translated from language to language?
/me wouldn't. - Nov 17 2003

Karamba & Superkaramba by bartvh 34 comments